New blogs

Leherensuge was replaced in October 2010 by two new blogs: For what they were... we are and For what we are... they will be. Check them out.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Nakba: 62 years and still...


Surely one can write forever on this genocide but one can also for a change merely held respectful silence for the victims without reparation, for the victims of Zionist terror that still claim for return and that are still being murdered by the same arrogant criminal gang.




The natives of what is now insultingly called Israel, dumped by their enemies in the Gaza Strip, display their hope in that key, the key of what was once their home (photo from Gara).

Justice when? There cannot be peace without return, without civil rights, without democracy.

Zionists go home!

3 comments:

Anne Gilbert said...

Maju:

I think Israel(or at least some of the people in it) started out with high ideals. They made the fatal mistake of not recognizing the Palestinians as fellow Israelis with all the rights and privileges of its Jewish citizens. If they had done this, Israel would be a very different kind of place, and, I think, much more lie what some of its founders wanted it to be. As things stand now, there are two hostile, but closely related, groups, both linguisically and genetically, who mutually don't understand one another, and refuse to listen to one another. The present Israeli government just exacerbates the situation by its despicable actions, such as the bombing of GAza in late 2008-early 2009

Maju said...

"I think Israel(...) started out with high ideals".

I think they started with very good propaganda and in an age when European colonial adventures still had some prestige (South Africa, Algeria, Siberia... the very West of the USA). The whole project belongs to that same imperial epoch that ended around the 1960s overall, in South Africa only in the 1990s and in Palestine not quite yet.

The whole project was conceived under the influence of late 19th century Romanticism, which was also an age of rabid and cruel imperialism (the partition of Africa, "Free Congo" and Namibia massacres included). In that time, that the white men could walk on someone's else land and declare it "empty except for a few niggers" (the term and concept meant "subhumans we can kill without feeling guilty"), what was exactly what the Zionist did in Palestine with the blessings of the so-called "international community": the UK, France, the USA and their satellites, using a UN that was upon that time essentially a white men's club.

All sovereign southern nations voted against, except those from America, who were also fully in the colonial paradigm internally (racism and exploitation of aborigines and blacks, only now being broken in full with the first non-white presidents in many countries since Benito Juárez: Chávez, Morales and Obama).

Whatever the case their goal was since the beginning to take over a country that was not theirs and replace the natives somehow. That sick dream however proved unworkable because they could not just deport the locals elsewhere nor impunely murder them Nazi style.

But that's what they want and that's the only thing they can do if they want a Jewish only religious state: Israel (as opposed to a unified multi-ethnic secular Palestine).

For that reason Israel does not want peace. It can pretend it's negotiating but it is not negotiating, just sabotaging the negotiations in order to gain more time to keep on with the ethnic cleansing and bantustanization of Palestine at both sides of the meaningless green line.

The only thing Israel objectively wants is the preservation of that religious racist Jewish state and its consolidation at the expense of the natives, who are to be kept in a strict regime of apartheid, deported or even murdered as the occasion requires.

Ideally they would deport all natives to Jordan or elsewhere and allow only Jews, sanctioned by the rabbinate and mostly of European or American origin. If they can't, as it's the case, what they do is to park them in ghettoes as are all the Palestinian "autonomous" areas: Gaza and the little islands of the West Bank, depriving them of everything (water, sanitation, freedom, human rights, a nationality, democratic representation, etc.)

This is not different at all of what Nazis did with Jews and other minorities in Europe in the 1930s. The only thing they have not dared to implement yet is the gas chambers... but all will come if the USA, Canada and Europe keep financing the murder machine that is Israel and ignoring the demands of the legitimate owners of the country and all the people of god heart that supports them worldwide.

Zionism is racism, is imperialism, is colonialism of the worst kind, is genocide, is apartheid, is state terrorism. Zionism is unacceptable for those who support the concept of universal human rights. Zionism is transposed Nazism and nothing else.

(continues)

Maju said...

(continues from above)

This government is just what Israel would produce normally. In fact it's not that different from previous governments, just more outspoken in their Zionazi plans. Otherwise is the same: there's no alternative while Israel is fed by the Western governments. Only if the switch is turned off and an institutional blockade, maybe supported by a UN intervention in Gaza waters to begin with and surely also nationalization of Zionist interests in our countries (such as Goldman Sachs), then a comprehensive solution South African style can be implemented.

But by the moment racist Israel, unlike it used to be the case with apartheid South Africa, is allowed in international competitions of all sorts as well as international markets. Not just that: EU and the USA give billions and billions away to Israel so it can continue its genocidal policies.

All that is intolerable and makes me, and many others, terribly angry and shameful of our rulers and political systems, which are not certainly committed to Human Rights and all those humanist and democratic values they fill their mouth with.

Whatever the case, Israel is simply unworkable: a failed criminal state (albeit with nukes) kept alive only by continuous massive foreign aid.

Even worse from certain viewpoint is how the Zionist international mafia controls our governments by control of the corporations, media and political resorts. This is particularly outrageous in the USA, where a tiny minority of about 2% really controls the whole state surreptitiously by non-democratic means. In many aspects the USA is a colony of Israel, though also its de-facto motherland.

It's a very interesting case to study in detail: how an ethnic mafia with a religious-political agenda has managed to control a whole empire. But it happened before or otherwise how did Christianity topple the Roman Empire?

Insidious Yaveh-ists.

In any case there are two possible stands with Israel: (1) support it no matter what (Zionism) or (2) oppose it furiously (anti-fascism). There are no third ways here, the same that there were no third ways with Hitler (who by the way enjoyed the tacit support of the UK and the Zionist mafia, at least initially).