tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3563811638411839784.post3003547745588142668..comments2023-05-15T07:11:30.874+02:00Comments on Leherensuge: Molecular clock, two to six times slower than thoughtMajuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12369840391933337204noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3563811638411839784.post-22780832695958658982009-11-16T13:49:15.864+01:002009-11-16T13:49:15.864+01:00Thanks for the link but I understand that by great...Thanks for the link but I understand that by greater, they mean slower. At least that is what the press release says. <br /><br />Have you read the whole paper?Majuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12369840391933337204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3563811638411839784.post-15035979096764131612009-11-16T09:59:37.835+01:002009-11-16T09:59:37.835+01:00You shouldn't rely on press releases.
http://...You shouldn't rely on press releases.<br /><br />http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2009/11/time-independent-evolutionary-mtdna.html<br /><br />"the rates of evolution of the mitochondrial genome are <b>two to six times greater</b> than those estimated from phylogenetic comparisons. "<br /><br />So, now you have the "hard evidence" that proves that you were wrong.Dienekeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.com